Tuesday, June 9, 2009

celeb news from creeping magazine stands.



Yesterday my friends and I were walking around in Vaughan Mills and we came across a magazine stand with a picture of Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart passionately kissing on the front page of  "OK" Magazine, which apparently wasn't a part of the "New Moon" filming process. Catherine, the director of "Twilight," was reported to have said that R.Patts has always been obsessed with Kristen and loves the fact that she is a down-to-earth, easy-going girl. Has Kristen returned the favour? 

It would be good for publicity if the two dated, fell in love, and all that but what would it do to the filming of the next two episodes of the Saga, "Eclipse," and "Breaking Dawn?" Well, as we have all learned from celebrity dating, it could do two things. For starters, the so-called relationship could make the films seem more lovey-dovey and less awkward when moments like lines seem to be forgotten happen (ahem, end of "Twilight" where Stewart actually stutters for three minutes before saying the word "No"). On the other hand, if the two break up R. Patts would probably have no problem and push the awkwardness aside. Stewart, on the other hand, would stutter for seven minutes instead of three. Not that these options would bring the hype down about the Saga since mostly every teenage girl in the theatre will be there excited to see a moving-picture version of the novel they have in their heads. Whether the moving picture sucks, which is more probable, or is superb, they will still keep coming out with their Team Edward and Team Jacob t-shirts. 

I just have one question to pose. It has to do with the image on the front page of "OK" Magazine. The image was alongside others, but the passionate kiss looked very similar to the passionate kiss from the "New Moon" exclusive photos. R.Patts wasn't wearing a shirt and his face even looked a little bit in pain. So my question is, is the picture authentic or edited in context to make the claim in the celebrity magazine more legit?

This just in from "OK" Mag's website. Emma Watson, who played alongside R.Patts in Harry Potter, has let it slip in an interview that the two "Twilight" stars could possibly have something romantic flowing between their veins. “Oh god! He's absolutely hot! He's driving me crazy...But we're just good friends and can be on the phone for hours, because I know that there's something going on between him and Kristen Stewart," said Watson.

The apparent duo have been strongly denying that they are a couple, even though it has been reported that they have been hanging around in cozy corners.

It's all the same these days with celebs; they deny they're hitched, come public when something dramatic happens for publicity like a pregnancy, a ring, a make out scene on the streets of New York, or any other scandal like cheating and wedding days. Obviously, we can't trust what the tabloids say because they have the power to change any photo and any quote they want to suit their context. But, when the news is released that it is either true or false that any two celebs are hitched (or not) it is rewarding. Nonetheless, this could all just be a stunt.

No comments: